Talk:Naoum Mokarzel/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 05:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Observations
[edit]- Consider (Lede): print a number of books and to circulate Maronitism and Lebanese nationalism Since the link for Maronitism goes to Maronite politics it might be better to put this in the text instead of Maronitism.
- done, thanks _Elias Z. (talkallam) 12:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Done
- Reference 20 goes to 404.
- all references reviewed, thanks _Elias Z. (talkallam) 12:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Broken link to article fixed _Elias Z. (talkallam) 06:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Done
- Mokarzel represented the Lebanon League of Progress in the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 where he advocated French tutelage over Mount Lebanon. What is the source for this statement?
- Same ref as those at the end of the passage, I added them at the end of the pasage. _Elias Z. (talkallam) 12:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Done
Religion and sectarianism
[edit]- The first paragraph in this section is too long without citations. (It looks like original research.) Put some more references in sentences.
- Citations from original articles by MK added. _Elias Z. (talkallam) 07:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Done
- With respect to Mokarzel's conflict with the Maronite clergy, we need to have some reference to their control over the ignorant, uneducated, backward Syrian women in the US (in this section; I know there is a following section on Female literacy).
- I added a passage about clergy meddling in women affairs and a line about child and forced marriage. _Elias Z. (talkallam) 07:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Done
- as immodest if they became writers of gave public lectures --> should be writers or gave public lectures Done
- Fixed by George _Elias Z. (talkallam) 07:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is a very well referenced and researched article.
- (Comment) I am not altogether sure about Arabic page numbers in references.
- Yep. It's like Roman numerals in some book preambles. _Elias Z. (talkallam) 07:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Resolved
- Yep. It's like Roman numerals in some book preambles. _Elias Z. (talkallam) 07:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Final
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Can we attend to the matters above? --Whiteguru (talk) 04:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Whiteguru I think I addressed all of your points. Please let me know when you deliberate. _Elias Z. (talkallam) 12:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Resolved