Jump to content

Talk:Naomi Osaka/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 20:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shall review this article. MWright96 (talk) 20:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, MWright96! I just updated the article to reflect this year's results, so it should be ready to look at. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lede

[edit]

Early life and background

[edit]

2011–15: WTA Tour match win at age 16, top 150

[edit]

2016: First WTA final, Newcomer of the Year, top 50

[edit]

2017: Slight regression, two top 10 victories

[edit]

2018: US Open champion, Indian Wells title, world No. 4

[edit]

Hopman Cup

[edit]

Playing style

[edit]

Coaches

[edit]
  • "Following her tough loss at the 2016 US Open," - heavy to avoid editoralizing
    • Changed to "Following her loss at the 2016 US Open where she could not convert a 5–1 lead in the third set"
  • Wikilink Japan Tennis Association

Endorsements

[edit]

Personal life

[edit]

References

[edit]

Good work on the article. There is nothing that is too major to be addressed. MWright96 (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MWright96, thanks for the review! I've addressed all of the comments above, and pretty much agreed with everything. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sportsfan77777: Okay then. Am now able to promote the article to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 18:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]