Talk:Nanoelectromechanical systems

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

top-down

"The top-down approach can be summarized as "a set of tools designed to build a smaller set of tools". For example, a millimeter sized factory that builds micrometer sized factories which in turn can build nanometer sized devices" Thats kind of nonsense!!! In the Aricle Top-down you find under "Nanotechnology": "

Main article: Nanotechnology

Top-down and bottom-up are used as two approaches for assembling nanoscale materials and devices. Bottom-up approaches seek to have smaller (usually molecular) components arrange themselves into more complex assemblies, while top-down approaches seek to create nanoscale devices by using larger, externally-controlled ones to direct their assembly.

The top-down approach often uses the traditional workshop or microfabrication methods where externally-controlled tools are used to cut, mill and shape materials into the desired shape and order. Bottom-up approaches, in contrast, use the chemical properites of single molecules to cause single-molecule components to automatically arrange themselves into some useful conformation. These approaches utilize the concepts of molecular self-assembly and/or molecular recognition. See also Supramolecular chemistry.

Such bottom-up approaches should, broadly speaking, be able to produce devices in parallel and much cheaper than top-down methods, but could potentially be overwhelmed as the size and complexity of the desired assembly increases. "

Stud

This is a really bad stud.

Name

yes it is stud. An explanation what a "Nanoelectromechanical system" means is missing. The name means a combination of electrical pats (e.g. capacitor) and mechanical parts (e.g. oscillating Silicon beam) on one chip with structures smaller than 1µm (Mikro meter)==>Nano. Sorry for my worse english. Because of that, I dont edit this article myselfe.

Not just electronics, but mainly physics!

Seriously, while electronics may be one possible application, there are many more fundamental aspects of nanomechanical systems. This should go into the category physics as well! Akhuettel (talk) 20:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Nanoelectromechanical systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]