Talk:Nanobubble

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: An interesting and well-referenced article that could well expand further.

Klbrain (talk) 07:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: This page has major problems. It cites very recent literature, including some text which is verbatim reproduced in the product literature of Moleaer. It is also incredibly selective in its coverage. Bubbles are an old topic, and have roots in work dating back at least a century, but none of this is described here. One example is the paper with ~1000 cites https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690210502, which includes some cited to Gibbs. This paper needs a major repair so it is an unbiased representation, as against the current version which is almost a product advert. No reinvention of the wheel please.

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]