Talk:NanoInk

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is a mess

Unfortunately I know nothing about the subject material so can't rewrite/clean up the article myself, but at first glance it looks like only slightly changed advertising material. For example, "NanoInk's proprietary Nanoencryption technology provides a unit level solution to the problem of counterfeiting." is horrible adspeak jargon - and worse still, nowhere are we told what "Nanoencryption" actually is, rather than simply being told of its effects. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.61.104 (talk) 23:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Discussion

I've tagged this article to be deleted. Please discuss this here. You can read up on the whole AfD process as well at Wikipedia:PROD--Cubic Hour (talk) 16:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the process for discussing deletion is documented at WP:AFD. The WP:PROD process is for deletion without discussion. As you seem to want this to be discussed I'll remove the prod tag and start an AfD discussion, which will be linked to from the template in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]