Talk:Nandi Bushell/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mujinga (talk · contribs) 15:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I'll take this for review - I notice that the nom @DaydreamBelizer: hasn't been active for 47 days, so I might go slowly and hope to hear back before making a full review. Mujinga (talk) 15:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not seeing any grounds for a quickfail, article is stable and neutral. I'll wait to hear back from the nom before proceeding. Mujinga (talk) 16:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator still hasn't been online since 5 March, that's fine I can leave it another week or so (during which time my internet access will be intermittent), then if i haven't heard back by around 8 May, it will be a procedural fail. Mujinga (talk) 10:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator hasn't edited since 5 March, so procedural fail it is, feel free to drop me a line if you want to review later on. Mujinga (talk) 09:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio check

Happy to say earwig is just flagging up direct quotes so that's ok

Spotchecks

on this version
1 - I wasn't overjoyed to see youtube as the first citation, but it's being used fine EXCEPT it needs archiving so it can be verified to the given date. So right now, that needs updating and archiving
3 - quote verified ok

Images

Appropriate and properly licensed

Prose

On a first read the prose seems ok, there's some sentences that could be pulled into paragraphs and the filmography needs referencing. More to come if the nom pops up.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.