Talk:Nanchang

China: Cities Top‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Chinese cities workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled section

I've Just Deleted This as at 7pm (Brisbane Local time) 16 September:

"Nanchang is selected as one of the ten most dynamic cities(Nanchang,Munich, London, Moscow, Ghaziabad, Goyang, Florianópolis, sin city, Fukuoka, Toulouse) in the world by the American Newsweek at June 10, 2006. Open Nanchang welcomes the world."

The article by Newsweek may exist as i've heard it referenced on several specialist blogs including chinalaw (although please note it was referenced in disbelief as Nanchang is very different in economic vitality from London, Munich and Moscow). While this article may exist - the author to whom english is an obvious second language has failed to note that Sin City, Florianopolis Ghaziabad don't actually exist while fukuoka is a prefecture in Japan not a city.

Finally sentences such as "open nanchang welcomes the world" have no place in an encyclopaedic work.

The economic section still needs work, tenses and verification - will get to this soon.

Found a link to that bit about Jiangling Motors producing Ford cars. But yeah, that economy section is still weak. Chinaculturefriend (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The 2006 article does exist - it’s invented. But this was almost 20 years ago - who cares now? Rustygecko (talk) 06:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It exists but the quote is invented. Rustygecko (talk) 06:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nanchang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the Japanese occupation

"In 1939, the Battle of Nanchang, a ferocious battle between the Chinese National Revolutionary Army and the Imperial Japan Army in the Second Sino-Japanese War took place."

It's the only sentence mentioning WW2, and it does not menton the Japanese occupation. Should it be corrected?--Adûnâi (talk) 13:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nanchang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Lantsong" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lantsong. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 11:45, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2017

All this about 2017 should be deleted.

“ In 2017, the city's gross regional product (GDP) was 500.319 billion yuan(US$80.03 billion ), an increase of 9.0% over the previous year.”

Who cares about 2017? Why not have the data for every year if not? If nobody comes up with a good reason to keep it I will delete it. Rustygecko (talk) 06:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]