Talk:Nan Tuck's ghost

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 February 2018. The result of the discussion was merge.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles

England

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles

2010 comment

I have rephrased the article in my own words and am waiting for a moderator to check this is suitable. The page has used the reference article as a lose base.

The article is still an almost exact copy of the source - you should completely re-write it using the source as a reference. After that, you should consider whether this is notable - I think it's marginal. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok give me a couple of days as I am working on other projects at the moment.

Hi again, 03jmgibbens, I took ten minutes out of my busy schedule to re-write this. It wasn't difficult. You should now consider its notability. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:43, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you very much I really appreciate the help you have given. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 03jmgibbens (talk • contribs) 08:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]