Jump to content

Talk:Namesco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

reseller status

[edit]

Until at least 2005 and probably still today Namesco are/were a reseller for MelbournIT.com.au and were unable to regester names themselves untill the purchase of simply.com --Lord Matt 21:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Awards: Citation Needed

[edit]

Really if we are to suggest that namesco won awards we have to also say are these notable awards and where are they noted. Furthermore is this a significant detail? --Lord Matt 16:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not everything they do is positive

[edit]

They use weird blacklists for their customers which block the communication between their customers and their rightful contacts, and there is no abuse email address given anywhere on the namesco website. The contacts' emails are bounced and there is no way to clear anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.157.42.208 (talk) 12:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They allow the administrator to set your private password - which is actually a breach of protocol and security. Also you as a user cannot contact them to sort problems that they cause. My ex-employer had an administrator who could reset your password BUT then YOU had to enter a new password. So why can't I change my password when and as often as I wish? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.51.200 (talk) 14:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COI/NPOV tags removed, hope that's ok

[edit]

I've removed the tags for COI/NPOV as I've gone through the article and referenced everything I can, as well as rewriting it for a better flow. Mibbisq (talk) 16:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Website

[edit]

At this date (28 September 2016) the website www.names.co.uk appears to be inaccessible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.38.84.70 (talk) 10:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Namesco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Namesco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]