Talk:Names of Seoul

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Suggestion for merge

Seoul ( Native Korean word) meaning Center/ Capital. Native Korean word comes from Puyo word. Puyo is Native Korean tribe from Manchuria/Northern part of Korean Peninsula. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Info2beaware (talk • contribs) 08:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese transcription for Seoul (for convenience) and one of the old names of Seoul, Gyeongseong are all about the name changes of Seoul inside and outside of Korea, so I don't think the separate articles are needed. And I think this article has to deal with other names for Seoul like Wirye-seong (위례성; 慰禮城, Baekje era), Namgyeong (남경; 南京, Goryeo era), Hanseong (한성; 漢城, Joseon era) or Hanyang (한양; 漢陽) as well. --Appletrees (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Names of Istanbul is a good example. I agree to merge. But, if we merge Gyeongseong into Names of Seoul, contributions by many people at Gyeongseong would be forgot, that sounds too bad. Technically, Names of Seoul should be merged into Gyeongseong.--Mochi (talk) 14:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, your last sentence sounds reasonable. We need to await for more opinions from others. --Appletrees (talk) 14:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should stick to the status quo, with a link from here to Gyeongseong, and the other names of Seoul, should there ever be a page created for them. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 01:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Consolidate. This is a complicated topic and probably needs a bit more expansion, but the articles could be easily consolidated into a single well-written article, rather than two seperate and rather similar articles. Aep (talk) 09:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note

The requested move discussion at Talk:Gyeongseong#Requested move also determined that it should be merged with this article.--Aervanath (talk) 07:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kingkitao

Old Western maps (before the late 19th c.) refer to Seoul as Kingkitao, based on the Chinese pronunciation of 京畿道 Gyeonggi-do. Obviously this is an exonym but as it appears on so many old maps, perhaps there's a way to mention it?

1882 British atlas 1875 German atlas 1832 German map — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.87.98 (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Names of Seoul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shanghainese

Why is the Shanghainese pronunciation used as an argument against the new name? It fits perfectly phonetically. --94.134.89.187 (talk) 21:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hanseong

Why was it ever called this? The article gets so caught up in this 2005 Chinese name change that it never bothers to explain where this name came from, nor where most of the other former names came from. Furius (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]