Talk:Namasu (Hinduism)

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title

Based on historical ngram data, it's possible that "Namuchi" would be the preferred title for this, as English usage favors that over Namasu. Looking at the texts in question, it seems a historical text search for "Namuchi" returns mostly Hindu-oriented texts, while "Namasu" gets largely confused with Japanese texts. ASUKITE 17:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. @Hinduistic, I think you should move this article to Namuchi. I also ask that you add the page numbers of your sources. This article could use some more primary sources as well. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 06:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Namuchi can be a name of an asura who is the brother of mayasura, here I am talking about Namuchi, son of mahabali. So, I can't move the article title Hinduistic (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hinduistic There is no issue regarding having multiple articles with figures of the same name on this website, especially since as far as I can tell, Namuchi is the common name rather than Namasu. So you can go ahead. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 05:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, booksfact.com does not appear to a reliable source, making unsubstantiated claims that Mahabali went to South America. Please look up reliable sources to know more about these guidelines. Thank you. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 05:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]