Talk:Nam Sago
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Yet another unexplained move.
[edit]Dear User: Onel5969. After not providing any reason for moving the Gyeogam Yurok page, and not responding to requests for explanations, this new move appears to be retaliation and even more baseless. The {{ R with possibilities}} states that when, for some reason, a new page would be an improvement, this redirect can be replaced by an article
. So what ? In addition, your edit summary please see WP: CIT and WP: CITE for what needs to be included in the sources to pass WP: VERIFY
looks rather dilatory. Are you saying that you know better than Hawaii University Press, Keith L. Pratt, and the Korean encyclopedias, or are you claiming these sources are unreliable, or what else? Pldx1 (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)