Talk:Nahikari García/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I should have this done by Sunday JAGUAR 11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The lead needs expanding quite a bit to summarise the article's body

" The programme wasn't solely football based" - was not

"She ended the campaign with 10 goals to her name for the season" - can this have a citation?

"García has worn the number 7 jersey for both club and country" - missing word?
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No original research found.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The lead definitely needs expanding before I can promote this. I also picked out a couple of minor issues but other than that the article is solid. JAGUAR 18:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jaguar, thanks a lot for the review of this article, and for the others you assisted with. It is greatly appreciated. I have extended the lede a bit. Let me know if that is enough. Cheers, Liam E. Bekker (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for expanding the lead! There's nothing else outstanding, so I'll promote this now. It's generally well written and comprehensive for the subject.

JAGUAR 10:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]