Talk:Nagda

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

India: Cities / Madhya Pradesh Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Guideline

Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Matter without reference is likely to be deleted. -- P.K.Niyogi 05:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition

{{WP India}} with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sashi Tharoor just tweeted Nagda

@twitter @ShashiTharoor: Nagda has perhaps the most beautiful temple ruins in India. Exquisite monuments 1000 yrs old, elaborate carvings.Pity:not a tourist in sight —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avkrules (talk • contribs) 14:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]