Talk:Nagapattinam/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 18:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC) I will review this article. It will commence in a day or two. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 18:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. Ssriram mt (talk) 22:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Introduction
[edit]I really like the succinct and informative style of this lead. Very nice!
Infobox
[edit]This is all fine, the image checks out.
Etymology
[edit]This section looks nice.
History
[edit]Starting soon. Also, I apologize for the excessive wait. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- No problem, thanks. Ssriram mt (talk) 00:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, starting again. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 17:19, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Can Sangam period be wikilinked?
- Done
"From 1799 to 1845 CE Nagapttinam was the headquarters of Tanjore district." Spelling error
- Done
Everything else good.
Geography
[edit]This section looks fine.
2004 tsunami
[edit]Looks great here.
Demographics
[edit]"...belong to Scheduled Castes (SC)and 700 people constituting 0.7% of the population..." Space between (SC) and the following and.
- Done
Everything else is good.
Economy
[edit]"...but lot of agricultural related trading in the town." How about you change the sentence to "but alot of agricultural commerce is conducted in the town."
- Done
"Bulk of the employment in the town..." The bulk...
- Done
What is CPCL?
- Done
Lowercase for the term "automated teller machines".
- Done
Everything else is good.
- Done
Transport
[edit]Everything is fine, but if this port was utilized by the Dutch, British or French as a naval base or port, please specify in the article.
- Done
Culture and tourism
[edit]This section is great, but the spelling of the section title should be changed to reflect how I spelled it above.
- Done
Education and utility services
[edit]This section's content is fine, but you should separate the education and utility parts into individual sections.
- I followed as in Thiruvarur where the thin section was merged. When split, it becomes very lean - so prefer to retain just for size uniformity with other sections.
Politics
[edit]Again, content is great but the section's title should just be "Politics".
- Done
Conclusion
[edit]This a very fine article and I enjoyed reviewing it. Once the given issues have been fixed, I will pass this article. Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 17:19, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have included the 2011 provisional totals and made minor modifications in other sections. Ssriram mt (talk) 04:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)