Talk:Nabanna

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed deletion (2007)

why should the article be deleted ? it also links up with several articles? was it a bot which marked it for deletion ? then the bot should take into account the on going edit process can be very jerky. I just created the title and then I was adding my research. It does not make sense. The article should not be deleted. Jeroje 17:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)jeroje[reply]

still working on it Jeroje 17:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC)jeroje[reply]

Merger proposal

Editor Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) proposed on 16 February 2016 that Navanna be merged into Nabanna.This talk section has been created to facilitate any discussion. Worldbruce (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navanna is a copyright violation of Banglapedia, and has been since it was created, so it is being speedily deleted. That makes the proposed merger moot, but it would be great if someone expanded this article with information from Navanna's sources (which I've copied into a "Further reading" section in this article). Worldbruce (talk) 06:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nabanna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071021104436/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1812/18120800.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1812/18120800.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]