Talk:Naïve realism (psychology)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Delldot (talk · contribs) 22:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will give this article a review. @Mcooperwhite: are you still around and willing to respond to a bunch of suggestions? If so I'll go ahead and give this a thorough review. delldot ∇. 22:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first comment I have is I think it needs more referencing. I can go through and mark where if you like, but at a minimum each paragraph needs a citation at the end. (If a citation within the para covers the rest of the info, just cite it again. That way if the info gets moved or other info inserted, we still have the citation). I'm gonna leave off for now until I hear back from you, but looking forward to hearing from you! delldot ∇. 22:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's been a couple weeks, no word from the nom. I'll fail this for now and perhaps it can be nominated again later if there's someone willing to keep working on it. delldot ∇. 03:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]