Talk:NSB El 18/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
... and the cabs are pressure tight. What does this mean?
Explained Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... and that NSB could expect "a racket" Would "dispute" be a better word than "racket"?
It is a bit difficult to translate this. The term "skikkelig bråk" could be translated to "dispute", but it implies much more than that; these are rather angry unionists who were a bit pissed off. Dispute seems a bit soft, but then again it may be more accurate than racket. Anyhow, there seems to be no optimal translation here. I'll change it though. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the fixes. Dispute is a better word in English. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References appear to check out.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Sufficient detail without trivia.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Licensed, captioned and tagged.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the very fast review. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pleasure, I am now happy to pass this. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]