Talk:NSB Di 3

NSB Di 3 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 25, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Trains: Locomotives Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 8, 2010

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:NSB Di 3/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ---Dough 48 72 23:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

The sentence "This unit was built by NOHAB, with motors from ASEA and engine from EMD. " sounds awkward.
In sentence "In March, the unit was sent back to NOHAB and went on a marketing tour, that would eventually reach Ankara, Turkey, in 1955", reomve commas after "tour" and "Turkey".
In sentence "The locomotive returned to Norway on 1 July 1955, was numbered 602 and put into service on the Nordland Line", add "where it" between comma and "was".
"and reduced travel time with one hour" sounds awkward.
The sentence "On 1 April 1987, a Di 3 612 caught on fire; although it was not more damaged than that the locomotive could be repaired..." needs to be reworded
"and for the only time a line with regular service with Di 3 was taken out of service" sounds awkward.
Combine the sentences "The choice fell on Class 93. Fifteen units were eventually delivered, allowing all passenger trains on diselized lines to either be operated with Class 93 be hauled by the Di 4."

I am placing the article on hold. ---Dough 48 72 23:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I have copyedited in response to all your comments. Arsenikk ^(talk) 10:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will pass the article. ---Dough 48 72 15:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The top photo should be from Norway

NSB Di 3 was built for NSB (Norwegian) and served for NSB for decades. For this reason the top photo should be a photo from Norway. Now the top photo is from Kosovo where the locomotive has been only a few years. NSB Di 3 is a Norwegian name for a Norwegian locomotive. Kosovo Railways are free to rename the locomotive if they wish, but this article is primarily about the Norwegian locomotive. Urbanus Secundus (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on NSB Di 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]