Talk:NPS MedicineWise

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal NPS MedicineWise is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Strange

Personally I find the info on the nps website strange. The references at the bottom to government websites are invalid. After hours of research I can't find a single link or mention of the nps from any Australian government website. I'll be back with proper info...

124.191.139.167 (talk) 18:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Back :) The nps sells itself as representing doctors, pharmacists, health professionals, etc. It's views are highly controversial. It is funded by the government..... WOW......come on!!!!!!!!!! this means nothing!!!!! They play it up like it means something! Not only that but the references that do work are dead ends and link to unheard of independent websites. I'm wondering what the actual FUCK is going on here....

Seriously someone needs to investigate this.

124.191.139.167 (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Reply-- NPS is a brand name, the business name is National Prescribing Service. I am sure you can find document and information on DoHA website. DoHA: Department of Health and Ageing.

Article issues?

I've cleaned up the article a fair bit and would reckon that most if not all of the objections have been addressed accordingly. I'm curious as to where the claims of "original research or unverifiable claims" come in, though...thoughts welcomed. Teamabby (talk) 05:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to remove Issues by end of April if no objections. Teamabby (talk) 03:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nps-socialmedia is editing this page, this is a conflict of interest.

We can't have organizations controlling information on their own wikipedia pages. Roidroid (talk) 01:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NPS MedicineWise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070410021408/http://www.australianprescriber.com/ to http://www.australianprescriber.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]