Talk:NO2ID

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

OwenBlacker (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

Feel free to contact me

I'm avoiding editing this article, as I'm on the Core Board of NO2ID but, if anyone has any questions they'd like answering, in order to de-stub the article, feel free to contact me. If I don't reply within a day or two to something on my talk page, then feel free to email me ;o) — OwenBlacker

Why improve?

It seems UK doesn't need ID cards, doesn't need immigration controls and the like. Why make identity theft harder?

Why take example from Europeans?

NO2ID Userbox

I created a userbox for fellow NO2ID members to put on their user pages. To use it, copy the following code onto your user page (including the curly brackets): {{User:StoptheDatabaseState/Templates/NO2ID}}

Conservative support

The conservative party pledge to get rid of ID cards if they get into power next election (will get back with a source for this). Can this not be counted as right-wing support for NO2ID as well as UKIP? TJ 04/06/07 2130 UTC

Bot deleted link to facebook support page

I think a link to the facebook support page is fair enough (2000 members) - is there anyway to stop the bot deleting this link? see: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2219865709

Merge proposal

It is proposed that Cromer no2id be merged into this article. – ukexpat (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose nothing on that page is sourced of that much importance. I'd just put it up for deletion. --neon white talk 21:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wound up?

Has NO2ID been wound up? The website doesn't look as though it gets maintained any longer and the discussion forum is inactive. 86.29.40.196 (talk) 21:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on NO2ID. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061205061410/http://stand.org.uk:80/ to http://stand.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on NO2ID. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071118130207/http://www.no2id.net/pledge/ to http://www.no2id.net/pledge/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070323115744/http://www.leavethemkidsalone.com/ to http://www.leavethemkidsalone.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070323115744/http://www.leavethemkidsalone.com/ to http://www.leavethemkidsalone.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]