Talk:NLRB v. Noel Canning
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed move to Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning
[edit]Per the manual of style, I propose a move to Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Why the abbreviation? ResultingConstant (talk) 21:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- @ResultingConstant: Because it's the Bluebook abbreviation, which is used almost exclusively in American law and is the Wikipedia standard for law article titles – please see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Legal#In_the_United_States. Thanks! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- oppose This is a SCOTUS case, SCOTUS does not use bluebook, and either the abbreviated version we have now, or a fully spelled out version are much more common and readable. The proposed version has a grand total of 300 google hits. Our current version has 24k. The full version has 4k. ResultingConstant (talk) 02:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- @ResultingConstant: The trouble with counting Google hits is that Google counts Wikipedia and its mirrors a lot as well. I understand and respect your position, though. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 04:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Low-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles