Talk:NHL 11/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA Review
[edit]I'll be reviewing the article over the next few days. Below you will find the standard GAN criteria, along with a list of issues I have found. As criteria pass, a 
or 
will be replaced with a 
. Below the criteria you'll see a list of issues I've found. Feel free to work on them at any time. I will notify you when I'm done checking over the article. At that time I'll allow the standard one week for fixes to be made.
Criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Issues found
[edit]Unfortunately I have to Quick-Fail this article due to several major issues:
- The lead is lacking information on gameplay and reception of the game. Per WP:LEAD, it should be a summary of the article
- Overall the prose needs copy edits and general cleanup. I recommend a peer review to help bring the prose up to snuff.
- It needs reorganization under Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines to comply with standards. Take a look at Backbreaker (video game) for how to organize a sports game article.
- There are {{Citation needed}} tags on the article.
- The Development and Promotion section has no info on the development of the game, only the promotion
- Soundtracks should not be listed unless they have been released commercially separate from the game, and then only with significant coverage themselves.
- The Reception section needs to be expand to at least twice its current size, organized by the positive/negative paragraphs, then type of comments (AI, graphics, etc).
Result: Quick-Failed
Reviewer: Teancum (talk) 14:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)