Talk:NGC 7793
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Hubble Type
[edit]albert_kangaroo: I think NGC 7793 should be Sd(s)IV according to A. Sandage's review (ARAA, 2005).
- The classifications here come from the NASA?IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which itself relies on the Reference Catalogue of Galaxies, Third Edition (RC3) by de Vaucouleurs et al. Both NED and RC3 give reliable Hubble classifications used widely within the professional astronomical community. Although Sandage is also well-respected for his galaxy classification work and other extragalactic work, his catalogs are currently not used as much as NED or RC3. The NED and RC3 references are therefore preferable. Dr. Submillimeter 19:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
citation needed=
[edit][1] this good enough citation?
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on NGC 7793. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927114352/http://www.supernovae.net/sn2008/ to http://www.supernovae.net/sn2008/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927114352/http://www.supernovae.net/sn2008/ to http://www.supernovae.net/sn2008/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060220061436/http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/mediaimages/sig/sig05-017.shtml to http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/mediaimages/sig/sig05-017.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 24 January 2018 (UTC)