Talk:NGC 7331

Question

I want to know why is considered the Milky's Way twin.

Better Picture

I found a better pic of NGC 7331 if its possible to imbde it into wikipedia or something. Being that it's a work of NASA, copyright doesn't apply :)

Astronomy Picture of the Day

And for "those" who are curious as to WHY NGC-7331 is considered our twin: Heres a pic of the Milky Way here

and

Heres a pic of NGC-7331 from roughly the same angle here

QED Ghostalker 02:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Milky Way's Twin

The Spitzer Science Center's press release on NGC 7331 stretches the truth a little when it refers to NGC 7331 as the "Milky Way's Twin". This was done simply to sensationalize the image so that the public would take notice. In actuality, NGC 7331 probably is not any more similar to the Milky Way than many other Sb galaxies. Moreover, some characteristics of NGC 7331 (such as the significantly larger central black hole) do not quite match the characteristics of the Milky Way, and some characteristics of the Milky Way (such as the possible presence of a bar) do not match the characteristics of NGC 7331. Please do not put the statement back in the article.

(Also note that my name is on the Spitzer Science Center's press release.) GeorgeJBendo 15:52, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on NGC 7331. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070517181042/http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu:80/Media/releases/ssc2004-12/release.shtml to http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2004-12/release.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on NGC 7331. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NGC 7331. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100618232522/http://www.caha.es/ngc-7331-a-large-spiral-galaxy.html to http://www.caha.es/ngc-7331-a-large-spiral-galaxy.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fleas too detailed.

I have copied the details about the fleas to the NGC 7331 Group page, where they belong. Any reason to keep the same details in this page (which really isn’t about the fleas)? Jmacwiki (talk) 06:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed most details about these galaxies, although the group’s own article is still linked here (of course), and they are discussed there. I have also removed the “dubious” link. Jmacwiki (talk) 05:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible supernova in 1903

https://www.universetoday.com/149644/low-cost-approach-to-scanning-historic-glass-plates-yields-an-astronomical-surprise/

Starbursting?

Why does the See Also section contain two links to starburst galaxies (and to no other topics)? Nowhere in the article are starbursts mentioned in connection with 7331 (or in connection with anything else, for that matter). Delete?

FWIW, 7331 looks to be flocculent (a largely visual categorization), so I have inserted in link to that in the See Also section. Jmacwiki (talk) 05:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]