Talk:NGC 695
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of NGC 695's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ned":
- From List of NGC objects (1–1000): "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for various objects.
- From NGC 953: NASA/JPL. "Database entry, NGC 953". NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database. Retrieved 2006-11-25.
{{cite web}}: External link in|work= - From NGC 514: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 514. Retrieved 2006-11-25.
- From NGC 625: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 625. Retrieved 2006-12-19.
- From Triangulum Galaxy: "Results for NGC 598". NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database. NASA/IPAC/JPL. Retrieved 2006-12-01.
- From NGC 772: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 772. Retrieved 2006-11-25.
- From Messier 74: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 628. Retrieved 2006-08-12.
- From NGC 925: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 925. Retrieved 2008-12-28.
- From NGC 520: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 520. Retrieved 2006-12-22.
- From NGC 891: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 891. Retrieved 2006-11-18.
- From NGC 604: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 604. Retrieved 2006-09-03.
- From NGC 800: "NED results for object NGC 0800*". Extragalactic Database. NED. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
- From NGC 784: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 784. Retrieved 17 February 2013.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)