Talk:NGC 3628

Move

see this

SUPPORT change the name to the real name. It is just a catalogue entry after all 132.205.45.110 19:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved, per discussion at the first link above. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 07:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Original source

Who was Sarah? What is the original source for such name of NGC 3628? I see no reasoning in the references that provided Astroguy34. An interesting story was with Mrk 1513. One guy suggested that it was often called "Kate's Quasar". The SIMBAD team then answered: "A full text search on "Kate's Quasar" in the references did not provide any occurence... So somebody was probably confused between a frequently used name in the literature and a nickname frequently used in a group of students... The name "Kate's Quasar" has been definitely removed from Simbad." By the way, the same guy proposed to include NGC 3628 name as "Sarah's galaxy". Nevertheless, this attempt was ignored by SIMBAD team. I also suggest to remove this name from Wikipedia article if the Astroguy34 does not have direct proof of the origin of the name. Orionus (talk) 16:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One does not need to know the origin of a name or the rationale behind the name to support the claim that it is, in fact, also known as "Sarah's Galaxy". The references cited are not just an isolated group of students, but a wide variety of differing sources on the web. "Sarah's Galaxy" has a much better ring to it than "NGC 3628" anyway. Nevertheless, the question of its origin is interesting and valid. When looking into it, I found this March 2015 Sky & Telescope (pg 24) reference (which has been added to the citations): http://mist.breg.si/MAGAZINES/Assorted%20Magazine%20Bundle%206-January%2015/Sky%20&%20Telescope%20-%20March%202015%20%20USA.pdf:

NGC 3628 in Leo has two popular nicknames. While many purists bemoan the assignment of these whimsical monikers, I think handles such as Sarah’s Galaxy adds interest to the objects that earn them. “Sarah” might refer to a 19th-century poet, but any definitive, authoritative source for the name seems lost. NASA’s APOD images of NGC 3628 are labeled Hamburger Galaxy, and inevitably some observers will associate the galaxy with that title. Most of us, however, know NGC 3628 as the third and faintest member of the Leo Trio or Leo Triplet.
— Sky & Telescope, March 2015

If it's good enough for Sky & Telescope, it's good enough for me. Astroguy34 (talk) 12:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If You write an article, I think You will always check Wikipedia at first. The author of Sky&Telescope article was not an exception. Sarah might refer to poet, might not... It is just guess until the original source will be provided. Orionus (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely that it may not refer to a poet. But I disagree strongly with the implication that you must know the original source at all, much less with certainty, before you can call it something (and I'm in good company as Sky & Telescope seems to agree). I also strongly disagree that the name was published in Sky & Telescope solely (or even primarily) because of this Wikipedia article -- that would be irresponsible. It must also be going off the many other sources for the name that demonstrate it is widespread. I may check Wikipedia when I write something, but I never cite it directly. It seems you're more the purist that bemoans the whimsical moniker. That's fine; you're entitled to your opinion. However, your opinion of the name does not change the fact that, as Sky & Telescope said, it is a "popular nickname", nor does it negate the countless and varied sources showing that it is, indeed, "also known as Sarah's Galaxy." Astroguy34 (talk) 20:19, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NGC 3628. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019181530/http://www.stargazer-observatory.com/NGC3628.html to http://www.stargazer-observatory.com/NGC3628.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]