Talk:NECAP

United States: New Hampshire / Rhode Island / Vermont Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Mid-importance).

Education Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Interstate compact?

Is NECAP considered an interstate compact? Neutrality^talk 18:48, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NECAP vs. NE-CAP

All usage on the page says NECAP, as does the RIDE website: http://www.ride.ri.gov/assessment/Results.aspx. Should this article be called NECAP, not NE-CAP? Greenth (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely correct. 98.82.3.171 (talk) 03:09, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:14, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NE-CAP → NECAP — The four states which use the NECAP (New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, and now Maine) ALL refer to this as "NECAP" on their Ed Department websites, not "NE-CAP". Frankly, this is as ridiculous as someone choosing to name New York City's article New—York City. What more can you need to make this move? Well, how about the local newspapers in Rhode Island[1], New Hampshire[2], Vermont[3], and Maine[4]? None of them appear to have ever heard of this "NE-CAP", either. 98.82.3.171 (talk) 03:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NECAP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120731040559/http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20100914/NEWS02/100913028/Vermont-schools-study-new-standards to http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20100914/NEWS02/100913028/Vermont-schools-study-new-standards

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]