Talk:NAFTA superhighway

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article does not require a map.
	This article does not require a junction list.
	This article does not require a KML file.

Not biased at all!

As of May 28, 2008, the article says Recently the name has come into widespread use to describe the alleged plan to construction a new, "four football fields wide", highway running through Mexico, the US and Canada. Those who try to deny plans for the NSH use a similar formulation in an attempt to smear NSH opponents. And, the only external link is to a "debunking" article in The Nation and not to any of the endless series of articles offering supporting evidence.

The "NAFTA Superhighway" is a conspiracy theory, end of story. There's no such thing being planned, and there never was. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 09:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And why the hell is having a big highway "bad" in any way, shape or form?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.244.246.64 (talk) 23:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Big highways tear up communities, and countryside; not to mention that they are a waste of money that will continue our countries dependence on oil. The route being built in Indiana is completely unnecessary. And the corridor is actually 1/2 mile wide.

Amazing how many uninformed people troll wikipedia deleting anything that goes against their orthodox belief system. 'why is a super highway bad' do research please. This is why wikipedia fails.

1/2 mile wide? that would be about 220 lanes of traffic! ROFL, don't forget your tinfoil hat, they're probably beaming you instructions from black helicopters right now! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.147.104.17 (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

COnspiracy theory... the use of this phrase is biased and judgemental. Please do look up Noam Chompsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.23.6 (talk) 02:48, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy theory is a term used to disparage any person who finds systematic problems in our government that seem to be carried out by more than one individual for purposes not clear to the uninitiated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.14.196 (talk) 13:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy theory

The article needs to make it explicit why this thing is associated with conspiracy theories. There are, as stated above, numerous reasons (environmental etc) to oppose the building of more roads, but I struggle to see why conspiracy theorists might jump on a highway project in particular as forming part of a conspiracy to undermine US sovereignty. Can anyone who knows more about this please present some details of the controversy in the article? Credulity (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]