Talk:N-Triples
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Things that should be added before this article becomes non-stub...
- What software imports/exports N-Triples?
- Why does N-Triples exist? When is it preferable to N3 or Turtle?
- What is the Content Type for N-Triples? (Also, as all valid N-Triples files are also valid Turtle and N3, Content Types for those are also acceptable.)
- I have re-added the technical and importance tags. Here's the test: find someone that knows nothing about computing, have them read the first sentence of this article, and ask them if they understood what this is about and why it might be important. If (when) they say they have no idea, you know the problem is not solved. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- While this sounds like a good idea, it does not always work in practice (e.g. article "Log-space_reduction"). If people do not understand "N-Triples is a format for storing and transmitting data.", then they won't understand other computer science articles as well. To answer some of the questions: We use N-Triples in some of our projects (DBpedia, LinkedGeoData), but there are certainly more. The format exists because of its simplicity and is sometimes used if RDF should be created without using a library. One advantage is that one can concatenate/merge two N-Triple files and the result is a valid N-Triple file (so two knowledge bases can be merged by merging their N-Triple versions). A disadvantage is, of course, that it needs considerably more space than Turtle because it lacks several syntactic shortcuts. Jens Lehmann 2008 (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- I don't believe that RDF/XML or Turtle support the CURIE syntax but RDFa does support it. zcw100 —Preceding undated comment added 14:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC).
Example
[edit]Example does not have valid triples when checked by http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ and does not show comments and data types in N-Triples text. Please make better example. --Nashev (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Expample is valid RDF/XML by now and I can't see anything that would be in XML but not in N-Triples. Markusmr (talk) 11:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
IANA registration of media types
[edit]The media types application/n-triples and application/n-quads are not listed in the IANA registry of media types. The n-triples registration form was posted to the ietf-types mailing list (also archived by Gmane) for review on 2012-04-18 and got some comments but it doesn't look like a revised version was ever posted there. For n-quads, I didn't even find an initial post. So I don't know whether IANA was asked to register these. 2001:14BB:170:1CE2:4E0F:6EFF:FED5:4EE0 (talk) 08:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Meanwhile it's obviously included in the IANA list: [1] Markusmr (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on N-Triples. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130426135418/http://sw.deri.org/2008/07/n-quads/ to http://sw.deri.org/2008/07/n-quads/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)