Talk:N-Acylamides

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 18 February 2015 by reviewer Arthur goes shopping (talk · contribs).

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Terminology

I think there is a problem with the terminology used in this article. The term N-acylamide is misapplied. If an acyl group is on the N of an amide, the result is an imide. But none of the chemical compounds listed in the article are imides. Most are amides, which could be described as N-acylamines (not N-acylamides), but that wouldn't be proper nomenclature. I also don't understand the intended scope of this article either. Most of the compounds described in the article are fatty acid amides, though some are fatty acid esters, so perhaps the content of this article should be merged into those two articles. ChemNerd (talk) 01:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Following up on ChemNerd's comment above, one option move the good stuff to fatty acid amides. A quick glance suggests that is what we are dealing with aside from possible self-promotion (the article cites a poster at at technical conference). --Smokefoot (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also some of the entries in the article's table are n-acylamino acids (e.g., N-acyl glycine) which are structurally distinct from fatty acid amides. They should be split out into a new article or deleted. Boghog (talk) 05:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it some kind of biochemistry nomenclature?. Searching gave me the definition "An acylamide having the general structure R1C(=O)NR2R3 where one or both of R2 and R2 is an acyl group." from ["http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/chebiOntology.do?treeView=true&chebiId=CHEBI:51514 www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi]. Christian75 (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; the proposal has been stale for more than 2 years, and over that period has greatly expanded, including a broader range of references. Given this, and the evidence that there are many more molecules than just fatty acid amides, suggests that there should be no merge. As this is stale, I'll close the proposal. Klbrain (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]