Talk:Nå skruva Fiolen

Nå skruva Fiolen has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 20, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nå skruva Fiolen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 16:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will undertake this review tomorrow. --K. Peake 16:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Super, thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Infobox looks good!
- Thanks.
"and mimics the rhythm" → "and mimicking the rhythm"
- Done.
"and certainly pretended to play it" → "certainly pretending to play it"
- Done.
Use double speech marks instead for "screw"
- Done.
Add a sentence mentioning Fred Åkerström's recording at the end of the lead, as this is notable
- Done.

Background

Good
- Noted.

Epistle

Music and verse form

Add relevant text to the audio sample to justify its usage
- Done.
Wikilink cello
- Done.
Pipe ²
₄ time to Duple and quadruple metre
- Done.
Wikilink timbre
- Not done, the article is about the quality of a tone, not the meaning here.
"on the 3rd and 4th lines," → "on the third and fourth lines," per MOS:NUM
- Done.

Lyrics

Img looks good!
- Noted.
"It is subtitled" → "The composition is subtitled" to avoid overusage of it
- Done.
Remove commas around Paul Britten Austin
- Done.
Versions of the start of Epistle No. 2 → Starting lines of Epistle No. 2
- Done.

Reception and legacy

Imgs look good!!
- Thanks.
Remove wikilink on cello in prose
- Done.
Remove wikilink on cittern
- Done.
Pipe tuning pegs to Tuning mechanisms for stringed instruments
- Done.
Wikilink folk music
- Done.
"recorded it also on his 1974 studio album Glimmande Nymf, where it was" → "also recorded the song on his 1974 studio album Glimmande Nymf, where it was included as"
- Reworded.
Wikilink flute
- Done.
Pipe classical to Classical music
- Done.

Notes

Shouldn't there be sources for the info of the notes since they are not mentioning anything corresponding with refs next to them?
- Added.

References

Copyvio score is undetectable at 0%!!!!
- Noted.
Shouldn't ref 10 be cited in place of ref 6 since that also invokes p. 63?
- Noted, but ref 6 is more specific, which is better for its task.
Cite Bellman.net as publisher instead on ref 9
- Done.
WP:OVERLINK of Fred Åkerström on ref 15
- Done.
Pipe WEA Records to Warner Music Group and fix WP:OVERLINK of Fred Åkerström on ref 16
- Done.
Pipe Sterling to Sterling Records (Sweden) on ref 17
- Done.

Sources

Good
- Thanks.

External links

Shouldn't you write on YouTube after the links to the videos?
- Done.

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 07:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Kyle Peake - all done now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:59, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass now, quick response once again! --K. Peake 07:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]