Talk:Mysterious Skin

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Untitled

The synopsis isn't really a synopsis- doesn't explain the plot. I haven't seen the movie but maybe someone else could add to it. Bigpacifisteyes

Does this film depict child sexual abuse, or pedophilia? Recent edits seem ot have muddied the waters. -Will Beback 02:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At first I reverted when someone changed it from pedophilia to child sexual abuse. Now the more I think about it, the more I think they were right. The relationship between the baseball coach and both of the boys really was abusive. Pais 18:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the synopsis is terribly-written and far too slender to do the movie justice. I will try to work on it when I have time. I think "child sexual abuse" is fine, rather than "pedophilia" (though it's certainly both), but - please, please, please - let's spell it "pedophilia" in the American way for this very American film, and not "paedophilia" or however it's spelled in Commonwealth English. Thanks. Moncrief 22:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"trashed"

"The film received extensive critical acclaim, even from critics who had formerly trashed director Gregg Araki's work." "Trashed" doesn't really fit the formal tone of Wikipedia, plus it seems POV. Isn't it sufficient to say that it received critical acclaim and give a citation?Ninquerinquar 04:57, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Budget

The information box states that this film had a budget of $10 million. This is obviously a mistake. Perhaps $1 million?? Someone either needs to document this or remove this obviously incorrect information. Dbart (talk) 14:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mysterious Skin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]