This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles
Savage Coast was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 August 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Mystara. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Alphatia was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 July 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Mystara. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Shouldn't there be a mention that the Known World Gazetteers did not originate from Advanced Dungeons & Dragons? It was published for the "boxed set" version of Dungeons & Dragons, which did not use the word "Advanced" although the rules material ended up being pretty extensive in its own right and were collected into a hardcover, before the "boxed set" version was discontinued. A lot of good ideas started in D&D as opposed to AD&D, such as weapon specialization bonuses. Then D&D was discontinued, and the version of the game using multiple hardcover rulebooks changed name from Advanced Dungeons & Dragons to simply Dungeons & Dragons. --204.92.65.10 (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Gazetteers (extensive material on the Known World) originated with Dungeons & Dragons, but not with the version which is now called Dungeons & Dragons. It's confusing and obscures proper recognition. --204.92.65.10 (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's part of the problem with the way WotC marketed 3rd edition... a lot of people don't even know about the AD&D/D&D split if they started playing D&D within the last ten years. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:32, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have added source material published on Mystara, hopefully clarifying some of the Dungeons & Dragons vs. Advanced Dungeons & Dragons question above in the process. However, I do not know which of the general Dungeons & Dragons products refer to or can be considered Mystara material. Perhaps someone could add the appropriate products?
In case most Dungeons & Dragons products could be considered Mystaran, I am not sure if the source material list I started here really makes sense, or if referring to another list of Dungeons & Dragons material would be better?
I have also added some in-line citations. It would be great, however, if someone could provide more "secondary source" than Dragon magazine. I imagine that some source other than TSR has made some statement about the Mystara setting over the years? Daranios (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not even clear on when the "Mystara" setting (with that name) was actually started. Did that come on with the transition to 2nd edition AD&D, or was that an unofficial name before then? 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:36, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]