Talk:Myrmecia inquilina/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Taking a look now. notes below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Cheers for taking this on! Burklemore1 (talk) 10:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

link endemic, social parasite (if possible), worker caste (if possible),

Y Linked, social parasitism directs to parasitism and no link is available for worker caste.

Aggression between any host species --> the host species with each other???

Y Did a small rewrite, although you may need to double check this one.

all good. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

This is due to many authors believing - could change to "Many authors believed" and link to previous with semicolon.

Y Done.

why are we not linking to Myrmecia gulosa and Myrmecia cephalotes in the taxo section?

Y Linked. I shall address the rest of your issues soon (probably next afternoon). I'll probably finish it off now.

link burn-off, fluorescent

Y Linked.

Otherwise looking ok....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: - succinct and fine. does the job nicely. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing! Burklemore1 (talk) 02:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)