Talk:Myobatrachus
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Myobatrachus
[edit]New sp.article to follow. ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 05:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, no. Since the genus is monotypic, there is no need for a second article about the species. See WP:TOL for more details. --Stemonitis 20:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- The article should be moved to Turtle Frog as WP:TOL states that common names should be used over scientific names. It is a commonly used common name, even if the frog is not commonly encountered. Thanks. --liquidGhoul 11:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Western Australia articles
- Low-importance Western Australia articles
- WikiProject Western Australia articles
- Start-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles