Talk:Myanmar Directorate of Defence Industries
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Myanmar Directorate of Defence Industries article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
B class review
[edit]Start class. The reasons for assessing this article as Start class are stated below. Djmaschek (talk) 19:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- B1=no. Many of the lists of weapons are not cited or only partly cited. The list under the Factories section is done correctly. That is, the leading sentence is cited, followed by uncited bullet point items, which indicates all the list items come from a single source. All the weapons lists are either completely uncited or only a few items in the lists are cited.
- B4=no. The History section refers to a number of weapons which need to have blue links. For example, the second sentence refers to the TZ-45 which does not have a link, but should have one. There are more examples (G3, BTR-3, Uzi, et al) that would take a time to look up. There are also locations that need links (Singapore, Bangkok, Inya Lake, et al). The section also needs to be proof-read because I can see places where words are omitted or the wrong tense is used. Where does "Executive Order 13619" come from? If this is from the US government, it needs to be stated in the paragraph where it is used.
- @Ominae: Please note that there is a bare link tag on this article that needs to be addressed. There is also a tag that says "too much citations" (bad grammar!) that does not make sense to me. Djmaschek (talk) 20:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)