Talk:My Big Fat Independent Movie

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Untitled

I'm pretty sure that these aren't meaningful sentences:

"My Big Fat Independent Movie was a box office receipts. [1] The film was received by the public and critics, receiving a very over at Rottentomatoes.com. The film was also festivals even though the film went on to play..."

Vandalism

I have removed and edited out a fair amount of vandalism and slant on this article today. Be on the look out for vandal edits, though they may be sporadic and erratic. Interestingly, even one of the reviews[1] of the movie cites online abuse by some haters of someone involved in the movie. Since the issue has been recognized, this problem can be solved by requiring citations of material added or modified. And I have never heard of Chris Gore before today, I thought he was Al Gore's son rebelling against Tipper's overbearing censorship-happy mothering style.--Milowent (talk) 21:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Big Fat Mess

Okay, I got a msg from a hater of this film (ghris core) asking me to help him edit this page. I won't do that. But I do think that this page does need to be balanced out. I'm in no way going to take sides here. This page, and other page (the filmmaker) have been viciously attacked. I won't stand for that. But I think the reaction was to go too far the other way. I don't blame the opposing editor. So I tried to maintain his/her edits while balancing them out. I'm going to use other similar pages and wikipedia standards as the litmus test here. Please don't revert my edits out of bad faith. I've used sources that will back up the changes made. If I had to pick a side then I choose wikipedia. Before reverting my changes please discuss on talk page. Both pages read better now. I'm at a coffee shop so I can't sign in for whatever reason. I will fix later with my account so that my anon status will not be confused as a sock or a meat. Sry for the confusion. Happy editing.12.23.116.10 (talk) 20:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw some of these edits you made today and they looked okay. I doubt many people care about this article, but we do want it to be accurate, though my main concern before was keeping away trolls.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 20:54, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are gonna talk crap bout me behind my back, include me in the convo, will ya? Whateve... fine, the changes are fine. Please dont delete my MINOR fixes. Lates'Ghriscore (talk) 15:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]