Talk:My Big Fat Greek Rush Week/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) 18:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll put up the comments shortly! NumerounovedantTalk 18:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Lead
- At the time of its initial broadcast, the episode was watched by ... people/ In its initial airing
- "My Big Fat Greek Rush Week" featured - "The episode featired"
- Plot
- The opening sentence seems odd "talks about her rape"?
- "heard Parker having sex, and Parker blames her." - blames her for what? having sex?her rape? it is awkwardly written
- "Keith (Enrico Colantoni) hikes through the desert." - How does that fit in here?
- "Wallace’s (Percy Daggs III) and Logan's (Jason Dohring) sociology professor recruits volunteers for a Stanford prison experiment-like study."
- "Cormac (Jason Beghe) starts following Keith." - I am really lost here. How does any of that make sense?
The same problem continues throughout the section. Too many short sentences that barely connect to each other. I suggest you re-structure the whole thing, because honestly in its current state none of it seems to be making any sense. NumerounovedantTalk 19:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- The section is much more comprehensive now. Still some minor blips: Towards the end seperate the conclusion with some the like "The episode ends with..." and who's Mac? NumerounovedantTalk 17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Production
- "Levine had previously worked with star Chris Lowell on the recently cancelled Life as We Know It" - recently? it's awkwardly written plus recently further complicates the sentence. Recent to the episode airing? or now?
- Ratings
- Same as Lead
- Is there nothing more to the section? Maybe if you add the viewrship rankings and/or Nielsen Ratings it becomes more comprehensive. You may also compare the ratings to that of the previous episode and show the trend in viewrship throught that. NumerounovedantTalk 17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Reception
- Will add comments shortly.
- "indicating that it was "great""- does the score indicates that it was great?(if so remove the quotes) or did he say so?(if so rephrase)
- It's included as part of the score. Johanna(talk to me!) 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- "very positive" - "postitive"/"lauded the episode"
- Rowan Kaiser, writing for - remove the comma NumerounovedantTalk 17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- References
- Publishers missing in refs 3, 6 & 10
- That's bizarre. I don't usually make that mistake. Fixed. Johanna(talk to me!) 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- These minor issues are sometimes overlooked! That's perfectly fine. NumerounovedantTalk 06:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
NumerounovedantTalk 13:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Numerounovedant: I have responded to all your comments so far. I am looking forward to hearing your remaining comments on the article! :) Johanna(talk to me!) 15:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Johanna: Great work that you are putting into on all the articles relating the topic. just the few queries and I'll be happy to go through with the nomination. NumerounovedantTalk 17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Numerounovedant: I have responded to the rest of your comments. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Johanna(talk to me!) 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Final Comments
-
- @Johanna: All my queries were addressed. Well done! NumerounovedantTalk 06:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: