Talk:My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross
Appearance
My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 16, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: QuietHere (talk · contribs) 17:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 03:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a quickfail. At this time, I think the organization of background information is not where it should be for this type of article. The reception section also requires significant work to bring it to standard; it is overly quote-based.
Suggestions for the nominator:
- Increase the detail on the background and development of the album. Add some context about past releases. Look at other album GAs to see how this is done.
- A Reception section should not be a string light of quotes. Right now, there is a quote in every sentence beyond the summary of this section! Keep a handful of quotes whose wording is particularly useful or noteworthy and paraphrase the rest.
- Review best practices for albums at MOS:ALBUM.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.