Jump to content

Talk:Mutemath/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why? There are tons of things you could mention, but unless it's particularly relevant to the band's music it doesn't seem necessary. Sir Lemming 19:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't have time to edit the article, and I'm a Wikipedia newbie, but the language in the biography seems juvenile and unprofessional. Someone should revamp the section. Protokurios 02:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I agree with this comment. Some of the stuff written is more opionated than factual. I've never even heard the music from this band before, but I don't think lines like this belong in an encyclopedia entry. The result was a captivating soundscape of experimental rock drenched in irresistible hooks. FinalBowser 20:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Routers link about "national news" is broken.

I found this other link... though I'm not sure if it's a "national" enough source to use. Someone decide... it's here if you want it.

http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060421/ENT02/604190340/1004

Christian

[edit]

It doesn't mention anything about them being a Christian band, does it? Some places state that they are, perhaps this should be brought up?

Well, there not, but that whole lawsuit thing with warner brothers could use a mention --T-rex 06:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(In response to both the immediately above and Sir Lemming's comment at re: relevance of Christian belief to the band's music...)
Given that Earthsuit was in fact a Christian band, and Mute Math still retains a sizeable Christian fanbase from that endeavor, that history is directly relevant to their music now. Of course the members of the band are still Christians, but as artists, I don't think they want anything to do with being called a "Christian band".(see article) It's nothing to be ashamed of though. Why can't it be mentioned as a factoid under the Trivia heading? — Souldier77 20:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]