Talk:Must-carry

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Must carry rules in the US

This article is outdated regarding Must-Carry rules in the US, the rules changed significantly on Jan 1, 2013 66.182.212.7 (talk) 01:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide view

In a disagreement about how to properly categorize this article, a user indicated that the term is used internationally. However, as written, the article is exclusively American in focus. If it's an international term, then the article needs to be expanded to reflect international usage, and if it's American-specific, then it needs to be restricted to American-specific categories and come out of international parent categories such as Category:Television. Please clarify. Bearcat 02:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If there is must-carry worldwide, as there apparently is in Ireland, then authors should add material as needed rather than complain about a lack of globalization. Tvccs 21:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this article...

I've made a number of visits here, and was glad to see this article was here in the first place. I thank all the contributors to it, and hope it will be expanded further. In this instance, I was the lead expert for the government and the broadcasters on Turner and produced 100,000 pages of orginal research, which provided much of the factual basis the Court eventually relied upon, and was also directly involved in the passing of the Satellite Home Viewer Act. Please be careful about editing information here if you are not thoroughly familiar with the subject matter. Tvccs 18:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Section removed: - Australia and NZ

Australia has very few cable television systems on a per capita basis. The Australian regulator may not have any must-carry rules. However, because of the relative dearth of media in Australia and the coming of digital television, one must assume a must carry imperative for all terrestrially broadcast TV channels including the community Channel 31.^{[citation needed]}

NZ has even fewer cable systems on a per capita basis than Australia coupled with a similar dearth of local media. It can be safely assumed that any NZ cable system would carry all available terrestrial TV stations that can be received at its various head ends. -- ends --

Rich Farmbrough, 22:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Must-carry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214111136/http://networkedblogs.com/zJMOu to http://networkedblogs.com/zJMOu

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]