Talk:Museum of Socialist Art/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Will review this soon. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- General
- Are there really no more sources for this article? It may be called "not notable" then.
- Yes, I found four book refrences which In have added with some text
- Lead and infobox
- Name the language in the infobox
- Linked to Bulgarian language
- I think the two paras can be merged.
- Merged.
- Description
- What is "easel"?
- It is easel painting. Now linked
The prose is fine, and those are my comments for an article as short as this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 16:05, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sainsf I will address the above issues shortly. But what is the minimum number of references required for a GA?Nvvchar. 07:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sainsf With four book refrences and some additional text, it should be OK. Please see. Will be glad to address any other issues. Thanks.Nvvchar. 08:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Seems fine now. This should make a GA. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Sainsf.Nvvchar. 00:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)