Talk:Muse (headband)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Muse (headband) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 July 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Muse (headband) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Toronto may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... I am very surprised that this article has been tagged for A7 deletion. It is not within the remit of that criterion. Regarding the G11 tag, the article is not excessively promotional. While the article would certainly benefit from copy-editing to make it more encyclopedic, it does not justify speedy deletion. Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Axl: I agree entirely. Why did you not remove the CSD tag? Adam9007 (talk) 16:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- I simply followed the instructions from the link that said "Contest this speedy deletion"... Axl ¤ [Talk] 18:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Axl: It and WP:CSD also state that you may remove the tag, as long as you're not the article's creator. Adam9007 (talk) 18:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. Axl ¤ [Talk] 19:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Axl: It and WP:CSD also state that you may remove the tag, as long as you're not the article's creator. Adam9007 (talk) 18:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- I simply followed the instructions from the link that said "Contest this speedy deletion"... Axl ¤ [Talk] 18:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
It reads like a commercial adv. Huge claims, zero evidence or research. Doesn't look good for wikipedia
[edit]It reads like a commercial adv. Huge claims, zero evidence or research. Doesn't look good for wikipedia Sabari (talk) 20:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)