Talk:Muse (Hong Kong magazine)

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (290)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,046)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,463) • Stub-Class articles (6,712)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (390) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,342)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Untitled

I strongly oppose deleting this article. Even though Muse Magazine is quite new, it is getting more and more popular in Hong Kong. Can anyone tell me what should I do to prevent this article from being deleted?

Normally you want 3rd party coverage, like links from other publications discussing the magazine. Local newspapers reviewing it, etc. Needs Reliable Sources indicating it is notable. Pharmboy (talk) 13:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am adding more sources to it. do you think it's ok now?

As a side note, it is helpful if at least one reference discussing the mag is in english, since we are the english version, although that isn't a requirement per se. Pharmboy (talk) 13:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

finding one... hold on... Germanomaniac (talk) 14:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

is it ok now? Germanomaniac (talk) 14:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't up to me, I am just an editor like you and tagged it. It is up to an admin, who will likely wait a while to give you ample opportunity to fix it since he can see the conversation here and see a good faith effort to comply with the "must assert notability" requirement. Pharmboy (talk) 14:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the link you gave is broken. An admin rm the tag for other reasons ( I used wrong tag for this type of article) and suggested AFD. If you can fix the link that leads to a local review, I would guess it passes the test, at least in my eyes. Pharmboy (talk) 14:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i've tried it but it links perfectly fine for me... Germanomaniac (talk) 14:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Might be because I fixed the links ;) Check the history and summaries. You added / after all the links. Pharmboy (talk) 15:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, now i understand why... i added a slash after each url... will make sure that i dont do it in future... anyway, thanks for fixing the links!!Germanomaniac (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magazine closing

Subscribers got notices saying that they would be getting their last issues in December and getting refunds on subscription money, so it's very likely Muse is closing soon. However, I think it was important enough a publication to keep a Wiki page up, so long as we are clear in the text that this was a former publication. I'll come back at the end of Dec, to see if magazine really is closed or not. (Technically, it's still open now) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpkin888 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have the last print edition in hand with a letter from the editor saying it is the last issue. I also got a letter from then a while ago announcing its closure. However (oddly) they have not posted news of this closure online yet. As soon as they do, I'll put in an e-link. Pumpkin888 (talk) 16:30, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There were Chinese columnists writing about the closure of Muse a while ago. If there are no English sources perhaps it's good to add some Chinese in. Germanomaniac (talk) 09:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Muse (Hong Kong magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]