Talk:Murrumbeena, Victoria

Australia: Places / Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal Murrumbeena, Victoria is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murrumbeena, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100513204635/http://home.vicnet.net.au/~cogito76/html/art_block.html to http://home.vicnet.net.au/~cogito76/html/art_block.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is a photo?

Is a photo of the Suburbs Catholic Church allowed on it's Wikipedia page St Patricks Church is a icon of the suburb? I put a new photo I took of the Church on the page I don't see need for why it can't stay the Cheltenham Victoria page has a photo of a Catholic Church on it I did not take and the Brighton Victoria page has a photo of a non Catholic Church on it --~~Celco85~~ --~~Celco85~~

An image of a church is fine - it's more a question of context. Where it was originally in "History" it had none (context), and similarly it's not considered architecturally significant. However there's now a gallery for the Education section, with that church image there, next to the one of St Pat's Primary, since the text describing that school refers to it (the church). Foozwah (talk) 07:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay moving it there that is fine. --Celco85Celco85 (talk) 10:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]