While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
@Tuhin Hi,
I’ve worked on articles like Murder of Abrar Fahad, Killing of Emmanuel Chidi, and Killing of Nahid Hossain, where I focused on improving structure, tone, and adherence to guidelines. Looking at this article, I noticed it’s missing some key elements, such as an appropriate infobox, proper section titles, and formatting in the lead. I’d like to make these updates to align it with WP:P&G and ensure an encyclopedic tone. I’ll be careful to avoid any WP:EW and would welcome any feedback or input. Thank you — Bruno 🌹 (talk) 09:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To prove the claims, Bangladeshi media has been used unilaterally. In this case, the news broadcasted by Indian media is contradictory to Bangladeshi media. Do not ignore Indian media. 36.255.81.242 (talk) 19:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reports from Indian media would have been cited if they were reliable. Unfortunately their editorial policies lack proper fact checking, while most of them are involved in a coordinated disinformation campaign against Bangladesh as described here. LucrativeOffer (talk) 23:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not interested in your opinions. As per Wikipedia policies, all WP:RS need to be consulted and covered if appopriate. It is a non-negotiable pillar of Wikipedia. It is not optional. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because it is not a reliable source for what is claimed. It is a political statement. The same section of the article also mentions Reuters producing the same misinformaion attributed to what is apparently an authoritative source. So it looks like the misinformation was generated within Bangladesh and you are barking up the wrong tree by blaming Indian media. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:48, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Political or whatever, an official statement by the government is always due, and the article also describes it as a government statement. Reuters has since rectified its report after the fact checking while Indian media continues to circulate the fabricated news, they are not the same. LucrativeOffer (talk) 00:54, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, not at all. Governments score way down the reliability pecking order. The Reuters mention disproves their theory right away. I am guessing that PTI newswire contained the misinformation and therefore it appeared in practically all the newspapers. Even The Hindu had it. But it seems to have been corrected within a day, and several sources did fact checks on it too. So you can't claim that it was deliberate "disinformation". -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:07, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Government responses/reactions/statements are always included wherever it's available. We have also included official statements by Indian government on Chinmoy Krishna Das's arrest on that article, even though it's right at the nadir of the same order you mentioned. LucrativeOffer (talk) 01:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such policy. It is subject to editorial judgement. In this particular case, it is a fictious claim, easily falsified. So there is no reason for it to be here, unless you believe Wikipedia is meant for regurgitating government propaganda. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The government didn't just say there was misinformation, it also claimed that it had "malicious intentions", according to our write-up, That is propaganda. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 02:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
