This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Why did the mother get 15-to-life, and the father get 25-to-life? Most of the US Judicial System favors the mother over the father when it comes to custody of children (in the false belief that it's more important to have the mother as custodian). By their logic, shouldn't the mother have gotten a greater sentence than the father??? Or was there something different about what he did to the poor kid that merited a greater sentence? Or was it just 'blind justice' being hypocritical?
I don't understand it either. The mother was clearly the murderer. While the father apparently did little (if anything) to stop the abuse and therefore deserves punishment, it appears that he didn't perform any of the actual abuse himself. The question is, why did he get a harsher sentence than that of the known and confessed murderer? It's damn stupid, if you ask me. I'd have given him fifteen and her a minimum of life without parole. -- El Payaso Malo 99.36.205.22 (talk) 22:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
