Talk:Murali Kartik/GA1

GA Reassessment

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there is one issue that needs to be addressed.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

As with the recently improved Irfan Pathan article, this requires updating to include events of the last year.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, very nice job too.--Jackyd101 (talk) 09:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

Although by no means essential, an image would be very helpful for this article.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards,--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is now GA quality, well done.--Jackyd101 (talk) 09:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]