Talk:Munroe Bergdorf race row incident

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.

If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.

Munroe Bergdorf race row incident has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 1, 2018. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Black Lives Matter Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Slanted Writing and Apologia for Bergdorf's Comments Apparent Here

This article is plainly biased. In the first paragraph the reader is told that some people thought M. Bergdorf's comments vis Whites were racist. The article declines to take a side on this issue. The last sentence of the first paragraph very cavalierly states that the response to the comments was racist and transphobic. This assessment is repeated later on in the article with citations.

If we cannot know whether M. Bergdorf's comments were racist then how can we know the response was racist? A very disappointing and slanted tone is evident here and not up to the standards of this project. MusselParty (talk) 06:12, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article follows the example set in the WP:Reliable sources. Those sources state that much of the online abuse Bergdorf received was racist and transphobic in nature (looking at the comments that she has received, is anyone really going to dispute that?). Conversely, in most cases those reliable sources do not equivocally state that Bergdorf's statements themselves are racist; rather they note that they have been regarded as racist by some but not by all. As you must be aware, Wikipedia follows the example of the Reliable Sources. Part of the problem is that Bergdorf and many of those who support her utilise a definition of "racism" deriving from forms of critical race theory which is far more restricted than the longstanding, common use definition of "racism" in British society. For the latter, "racism" is basically synonymous with racial prejudice, bigotry, or discrimination, regardless of who expresses it or who it is directed at. For the former, it refers to entrenched social systems of privilege that (in Western contexts at least) benefit white people over people of colour. The fact that you have different sides of the argument operating under very different conceptions of what "racism" is renders this a complicated situation. Bergdorf's comments are probably "racist" under the commonly understood meaning of the term, but are not "racist" under the critical race theory definition of the term which she herself uses. Conversely, the racially abusive comments that she has since received are "racist" under both definitions of the word. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're saying that as long as the authors of newspapers and online publications follow the doctrine of critical race theory in their writings, critical race theory is the only acceptable interpretation of events for Wikipedia. MusselParty (talk) 09:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Munroe Bergdorf race row incident/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk · contribs) 11:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by 3E1I5S8B9RF7

Very well written article. Balanced and reasonably well sourced. Just a couple of minor observations:

In the "Background" section, the text says: "She was raped during this period, an event which inspired her to take a greater role in social activism". The Guardian source says: "Bergdorf was raped during the period she was transitioning; she reported it to the police, but the attacker was never found...". Maybe that info that the perpetrator was never caught should be added in the text to expand this a bit.

Added. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the "Public response" section, "Jason Osamede Okundaye" is a red link. Either unlink him or consider writing an article about him. The same goes for "Illamasqua" in the "Aftermath" section.

I've removed the two redlinks. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can "Pink News" be considered a reliable source?--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 11:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's clearly not the best quality news source, but I think it fits the RS criteria. Certainly, it has been accepted as such for usage in FA-rated articles, such as Death of Leelah Alcorn and Murder of Dwayne Jones. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, 3E1I5S8B9RF7! Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion

Overall, I think this article meets the GA criteria and I am giving it a pass, accordingly.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 14:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Combine page with Munroe Bergdorf

A page on a comment seems excessive. Suggest moving content to Munroe Bergdorf and deleting page. Jontel (talk) 21:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This was the original article, with the "Munroe Bergdorf" article created after. There is a case for the two articles to be merged, but given that this is a GA it would be a shame if any of this is material was then junked in the process. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this news story doesn't seem to justify an article of this length, and would support deleting it or merging it into Munroe Bergdorf. Robofish (talk) 21:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]